Summative Project Topics
Choose one topic for your group project. Each topic has a clear research question, accessible public data, and a genuine policy dimension. Your group will design an investigation, analyse data, and each write an individual 4-page policy report.
Before you commit: Check with your instructor that no other group has chosen the same topic. First come, first served.
Topic 1: Does wind farm output vary by UK region?
Question: Do onshore wind farms in Scotland produce more electricity per unit of capacity than those in England and Wales?
Data: DESNZ Regional Renewable Statistics — renewable electricity by local authority (Excel, annual). GOV.UK: Regional Renewable Statistics
Variables: Installed capacity (MW), actual generation (GWh), load factor (%), region, technology type, year. Local-authority level, 2014–present.
Suggested comparison: Compare load factors across UK nations or English regions for onshore wind. Is the difference statistically significant? How large is it?
Analytical approach: ANOVA (4+ regions) or t-test (2-group comparison, e.g. Scotland vs England). Effect sizes.
Confounders to consider: Turbine age and model, altitude and terrain, grid curtailment, year-to-year weather variation.
Difficulty: ⬟⬟⬡ Moderate — data is well-structured; main challenge is controlling for confounders.
Topic 2: Is domestic electricity consumption falling?
Question: Has household electricity use per customer declined over the past 20 years, and does the rate of decline differ between UK regions?
Data: DESNZ Sub-national Electricity Consumption Statistics — regional and local authority level (Excel, annual 2005–2024). GOV.UK: Regional and local authority electricity consumption
Variables: Total domestic consumption (GWh), number of meters, mean consumption per meter (kWh), region, local authority, year.
Suggested comparison: Compare the rate of decline in domestic consumption per meter across regions. Is it faster in some areas? Has the decline stalled?
Analytical approach: Regression (consumption vs year, by region). Compare slopes. Alternatively, t-test/ANOVA on recent vs historical consumption.
Confounders to consider: Temperature/heating degree days, energy prices, housing stock (new builds vs old), population change, economic deprivation, uptake of heat pumps and EVs (which increase electricity use).
Difficulty: ⬟⬟⬡ Moderate — rich dataset; challenge is choosing a focused question from many possible comparisons.
Topic 3: Solar panel output — does latitude matter in the UK?
Question: Within the UK, how much does solar PV generation per MW of installed capacity vary with latitude?
Data: DESNZ Regional Renewable Statistics (generation and capacity by local authority) combined with local authority latitude. GOV.UK: Regional Renewable Statistics
Variables: Solar PV installed capacity (MW), actual generation (GWh), calculated load factor (%), local authority, latitude.
Suggested comparison: Scatter plot of solar load factor vs latitude. Fit a regression. How much of the variation does latitude explain?
Analytical approach: Linear regression. R² and slope interpretation. Prediction intervals.
Confounders to consider: Panel orientation and tilt, local cloud cover, shading (urban vs rural), proportion of roof-mounted vs ground-mounted, data quality (small installations may not report accurately).
Difficulty: ⬟⬡⬡ Easier — clean relationship expected; good for regression practice. Extension: add a second predictor (e.g. urban/rural classification).
Topic 4: Has nuclear output kept pace with closures?
Question: As older UK nuclear stations have closed, has total nuclear generation declined proportionally, or have remaining stations increased output?
Data: DUKES Chapter 5 — electricity generation by fuel type (annual, 2000–2024). Individual station data from EDF Energy annual reports or DUKES Table 5.11 (nuclear stations). GOV.UK: DUKES Electricity
Variables: Nuclear generation (TWh), number of operating stations, total capacity (GW), load factor (%), year.
Suggested comparison: Track capacity and generation over time. Calculate load factor trends. Has output per GW of capacity changed?
Analytical approach: Regression (generation vs year, generation vs capacity). Compare actual output to what you’d predict from capacity alone.
Confounders to consider: Planned maintenance outages, unplanned shutdowns (graphite cracking), Hinkley Point C delays, electricity demand changes.
Difficulty: ⬟⬟⬡ Moderate — requires careful separation of capacity reduction from output-per-station trends.
Topic 5: Do countries that invest more in renewables have lower carbon intensity?
Question: Across countries, is higher renewable electricity capacity associated with lower CO₂ emissions per kWh of electricity generated?
Data: IRENA Renewable Capacity Statistics (country-level, 2000– 2024, free download) + IEA or Ember electricity carbon intensity data. IRENA Data & Statistics Ember Global Electricity Data
Variables: Renewable capacity (MW) by technology and country, electricity generation (GWh), carbon intensity (gCO₂/kWh), GDP, year.
Suggested comparison: Cross-country scatter plot: renewable capacity per capita vs carbon intensity. Is the relationship significant? Does it hold after controlling for GDP?
Analytical approach: Regression with potential multiple predictors. Effect sizes and confidence intervals.
Confounders to consider: Nuclear power (low carbon but not renewable), fossil fuel exports (e.g. Norway has high renewables but also oil), country size and geography, GDP per capita, historical energy mix.
Difficulty: ⬟⬟⬟ Harder — international dataset, multiple confounders, risk of ecological fallacy. Ambitious but rewarding.
Topic 6: The gas price shock — did energy consumption change?
Question: Did UK domestic gas consumption fall significantly after the 2022 energy price spike, and has it recovered?
Data: DESNZ Sub-national Gas Consumption Statistics — regional and local authority level (Excel, annual 2005–2024). GOV.UK: Sub-national gas consumption data
Also: quarterly energy prices from DESNZ (for price variable).
Variables: Domestic gas consumption per meter (kWh), number of meters, gas price index, region, local authority, year.
Suggested comparison: Before-and-after comparison (pre-2022 vs post-2022) of consumption per meter. Did consumption fall? Has it bounced back? Does the effect differ by region or deprivation level?
Analytical approach: t-test (before vs after), or regression with a price term. ANOVA if comparing multiple regions.
Confounders to consider: Winter temperatures (heating degree days), boiler efficiency improvements, heat pump adoption, housing insulation upgrades, population changes.
Difficulty: ⬟⬟⬡ Moderate — topical question, clear before/after design. Risk of confounding with temperature variation.
Topic 7: How fast is the UK installing heat pumps?
Question: Is the rate of heat pump installation accelerating, and does it vary by region or housing type?
Data: Ofgem MCS installation data (Microgeneration Certification Scheme — public quarterly reports), plus DESNZ Boiler Upgrade Scheme statistics. MCS Data Dashboard GOV.UK: Boiler Upgrade Scheme statistics
Variables: Number of installations by month/quarter, technology type (ASHP, GSHP), region or local authority, property type.
Suggested comparison: Is the installation rate accelerating (test for non-linearity in the trend)? Do rural areas adopt faster than urban? Do certain regions lead?
Analytical approach: Regression (installations vs time), ANOVA (regions). Test for acceleration (quadratic term or compare slopes across periods).
Confounders to consider: Government subsidy levels and changes, housing stock (detached houses more suitable), gas grid connectivity, income/deprivation.
Difficulty: ⬟⬟⬡ Moderate — data access is straightforward; good policy angle. May need some cleaning.
Topic 8: Offshore wind — are newer farms more productive?
Question: Do recently commissioned offshore wind farms have higher capacity factors than older ones?
Data: DESNZ Renewable Energy Planning Database (REPD) — quarterly extract with individual project details (capacity, technology, status, commissioning date). Plus DUKES/Energy Trends for generation data. GOV.UK: Renewable Energy Planning Database
Variables: Farm name, capacity (MW), commissioning year, location, turbine model (if available), generation (GWh), calculated load factor.
Suggested comparison: Regression of load factor on commissioning year. Is there a significant positive trend? How much has efficiency improved per decade?
Analytical approach: Regression. Possibly ANOVA if grouping farms by era (pre-2015, 2015–2020, post-2020).
Confounders to consider: Location (distance from shore, water depth, wind resource), turbine size (larger turbines are more efficient), grid curtailment, maintenance and availability.
Difficulty: ⬟⬟⬟ Harder — requires linking two datasets and cleaning individual farm records. Rewarding for students interested in engineering.
Topic 9: Does energy-from-waste reduce landfill?
Question: In local authorities with energy-from-waste (EfW) facilities, has landfill use declined faster than in authorities without EfW?
Data: Defra Local Authority Collected Waste Statistics (annual, by local authority — tonnes sent to landfill, incineration, recycling). GOV.UK: Local authority collected waste statistics
Plus DESNZ regional renewable statistics (for EfW generation data).
Variables: Waste tonnage by destination (landfill, incineration/ EfW, recycling), local authority, year, presence/absence of EfW facility.
Suggested comparison: Compare landfill rates in local authorities with and without EfW facilities. t-test or ANOVA. Control for region and deprivation.
Analytical approach: t-test (with vs without EfW), or regression with EfW as a binary predictor alongside confounders.
Confounders to consider: Recycling rates (some LAs recycle more, not burn more), population density, waste composition, distance to nearest EfW facility (waste may be exported to neighbouring LAs).
Difficulty: ⬟⬟⬡ Moderate — nice natural-experiment design. Students must define “with EfW” carefully (facility in the LA, or waste sent to one?).
Topic 10: Electric vehicles — is charging infrastructure keeping up?
Question: Is the number of public EV charge points growing in proportion to the number of registered EVs, or is the ratio deteriorating?
Data: DfT/OZEV EV charging device statistics (quarterly, by local authority) + DfT vehicle licensing statistics (registered plug-in vehicles by LA). GOV.UK: EV charging device statistics GOV.UK: Vehicle licensing statistics
Variables: Number of public charge points (total, rapid, slow), number of registered plug-in vehicles, local authority, region, quarter/year.
Suggested comparison: Track the charge-point-per-vehicle ratio over time. Is it improving or worsening? Does it vary by region (urban vs rural)? Is there a relationship between charge point density and EV uptake?
Analytical approach: Regression (charge points vs vehicles, over time). ANOVA across regions. Two-variable regression.
Confounders to consider: Home charging (most EVs charge at home, so public points matter more in urban areas without driveways), devolved policy differences, commercial fleets vs private.
Difficulty: ⬟⬟⬡ Moderate — highly topical. Data is quarterly and well-structured. Good policy angle.
Choosing your topic
When picking a topic, consider:
- Interest. You’ll spend 6 weeks on this. Choose something your group genuinely wants to understand.
- Data accessibility. Before committing, download the data and open it. Can you read it into R? Does it have the variables you need?
- Statistical approach. Your project should use at least one formal test (t-test, ANOVA, or regression). Check that your topic maps to one of these.
- Confounders. The most interesting topics have genuine confounders that you’ll need to discuss. This is where the analytical depth comes from.
- Group strengths. Some topics need more data cleaning; others need more statistical thinking. Play to your group’s strengths.
Your instructor can help you refine a question within your chosen topic. The question in the title is a starting point, not a straitjacket.